Briefing
The situation
An analysis shows that 60% of the daily work of your junior analysts can now be done by AI. The output is better, faster and cheaper. But your senior analysts say, unanimously, that those very tasks were what taught them judgement. If you automate away the apprenticeship years — where will your future seniors come from?
Discussion
Questions to wrestle with
What are we really teaching?
- 1.Which of the apprenticeship tasks built technical skill — and which built judgement?
- 2.How do we separate what we're glad to be rid of from what we shouldn't let go?
A new career arc
- 1.What do a junior's first 18 months here look like three years from now?
- 2.What entirely new roles could emerge between 'junior' and 'senior'?
Framework · Capability shift matrix
To lean on
Automate
Repetitive, data-heavy, low learning value.
Augment
Human and AI paired up, AI does the heavy lifting.
Preserve
Manual — this is exactly where the learning happens.
Invent
Entirely new tasks that didn't exist before.
Decision
Possible paths
- AFreeze the current junior programme until we've redesigned it.
- BKeep junior recruitment but rebuild what the apprenticeship years contain.
- CCut junior recruitment sharply and hire more senior people externally.
- DInvest in an internal 'AI companionship' where juniors pair with agents under supervision.
Triggers
Drop in when the discussion stalls
- ▸Three senior analysts retire next year.
- ▸Competitors are recruiting aggressively from your junior pool.
- ▸Your clients are starting to ask who actually did the analysis.
For the facilitator
Tips to get more out of it
- Ask participants to finish the sentence 'the task that taught me most early in my career was…' — then see what that says about what you're now abolishing.
Reflection
To take with you
- "What kind of senior leaders will our organisation need in ten years — and what are we doing this year so they exist?"